Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carlraschke/Archive
Carlraschke
- Carlraschke (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
04 February 2016[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Gateofhorn (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LH Chicago (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Melatha (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Duikelmaan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User6915 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Scholarbyday (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
All of these users popped up around the same time on the Carl Raschke talk page. For diffs, see any of their contribution histories or the Carl Raschke talk page ([1]) or the Carl Raschke edit history ([2]). They are all associated somehow and at least some of them are likely to be sock puppets. Most of them have since been blocked but some have not. Given their penchant(s) for threats (for example), I'd like to know what is going on with these accounts. :bloodofox: (talk) 10:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
- Group 1 – the following accounts are
Confirmed to each other:
- Carlraschke (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LH Chicago (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Melatha (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gateofhorn (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gigem400 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gasometer100 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Group 2 – the following accounts are Confirmed to each other and
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Group 1:
- User6915 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tylerlakers (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Scholarbyday (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Group 2:
- Duikelmaan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is
Unrelated. - I've blocked/tagged the unblocked accounts in Groups 1 and 2, as well as Scholarbyday. I have not blocked Duikelmaan for socking, although they probably deserve to be blocked for other reasons.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've requested a block on Duikelmaan on the Admin noticeboard for harassment ([3]). :bloodofox: (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- All blocked. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)