Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sekk-47/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sekk-47

Sekk-47 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

09 April 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Sockpuppet created to help the master in causing disruption on various articles. Their edit summaries are very similiar e.g M [1] S [2]. They both have left abusive messages on my talk page with foul language and curses in them M[3] S [4]. Also, these both display a clearly WP:NOTHERE behaviour, and insist on adding bits which are not only unsourced, but also historically inaccurate. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, sock has admitted using more than one account here [5], perhaps referring to master account. Also adding another sock too, whose foul langauge master has just removed[6] from talk page of another editor, and whose name sounds like a duck to me. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After the report was filed, the sock is repeatedly leaving curses on my talk page[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Can any administrator block him from it? Sutyarashi (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
First I didn't use abusive language that was another user. Secondly I have sent you some references which you didn't check still. I didn't add unsourced data you can read that in many books of Indian history Gibari Sultan (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I've added Huzaifaswati39 to the list of suspected socks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Huzaifaswati50 has been indeffed for vandalism by another administrator.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gibari Sultan, Huzaifaswati50 and Huzaifaswati39 are all  Confirmed to one another. The other accounts are stale - the usernames are pretty ducky, but we'd need to look at the behaviour to be confident of the connection. I have blocked, but not tagged, the confirmed accounts - if we decide the stale accounts are likely the same person, it looks like Sultan Gaberi is the oldest account. Girth Summit (blether) 08:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagged the blocked accounts. I don't really see a point in blocking the inactive accounts at this point - re-report if they reactivate. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25 July 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same editing pattern as the sockmaster, and the sock has been recreating and removing redirects on the pages created by master-account. The language used is also pretty much same, with sock also accusing me of being Indian agent[14] like previous socks. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Registered right after the last sock was blocked, and has started editing from where the last sock left. Similiar editing pattern to the previous socks, with removal of redirects and re-creation of the pages. Sutyarashi (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  On hold - For training RoySmith (talk) 21:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @RoySmith Still need this for training? Courcelles (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Courcelles Thanks for the ping. That's in progress, yes, but looks like it should get wrapped up today. RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Behavioural evidence does not align between CiteGuardian and the blocked socks. If the account becomes disruptive, it can be blocked for disruptive editing. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

A brand-new sock of Khan Of Naral with similar editing pattern. Judging from name and editing history, it clearly looks like Duck to me. Sutyarashi (talk) 07:41, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


13 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Registered immediately after the sock-master was blocked. Similiar editing pattern, and has been edit warring at Swati tribe to re-instate the content added by the Khan Of Naral. Sutyarashi (talk) 18:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Sutyarashi (talk) 18:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


10 September 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

The article intersection, the newness of the accounts, and the username similarity are all there, but I got a little dizzy trying to figure out if they had similar POVs, so I am requesting a CU to confirm. Bbb23 (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


02 November 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

See the history of Pakhli primarily - IP range restores an article edited by numerous prior socks, Farleftguy edits it 3 (!) minutes later. This is one of many other overlaps between Farleftguy and prior socks - 39 of Farleftguy's 50 edits are on pages Khan Of Naral has also edited. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).  Blocked without tags Izno (talk) 22:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]