User talk:Johnsoniensis/2017

Article about Friedrich Klaeber - where does J come from?

Hello, Johnsoniensis!

You have been previously called "Felix Folio Secundus", and a user by that name made a change, on 09:38, 11 May 2010 , to the article about German/English philologist Frederick Klaeber, adding a middle initial to his name. Before your edit, he was just "Friedrich Klaeber", after your edit he became "Friedrich J. Klaeber". I would like to know what is your source for that piece of information, namely where did you find that J - and what it stands for. Nowhere could I find any info regarding Friedrich Klaeber actually having a middle name at all, and I have asked all my Anglo-Saxon colleagues in US. I would be very grateful if you could clarify this issue.

Yours truly, Nornore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.248.95.148 (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Culture of Odisha page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Lloyds

Um, why have you added Anna Lloyd and Martha Lloyd (principal) to the Cornwall Wikiproject? DuncanHill (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

When I saw "St Ives" in the infobox I assumed St Ives, Cornwall. was meant; there is nothing in the rest of the two articles to show that it concerns Huntingdonshire. Only if you point to "St Ives" does "St Ives, Huntingdonshire" appear.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

I've clarified the articles by removing the piping. DuncanHill (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Cornish Cross

Did you get a good look at the figure on that thing? It suggests that the good folk of Cornwall worshiped Charlie Brown. Anmccaff (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I do not know to which of the crosses this relates.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

This fellow, from Camborne, found in Langdon's Old Cornish Crosses. Anmccaff (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

The work I have been doing on Cornish crosses has been based on the 1896 book published by Joseph Pollard. The Googlebooks version is a later reissue of it. The latest of the crosses described by Langdon is likely to be 15th century and the earliest some time before the 9th century and there is great diversity in the shapes that are apparent on the fronts and backs of the crossheads.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Irish language organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Irish language organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2016 Cure Award

In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Birth Year of Eleonore Pameijer

Hi, on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleonore_Pameijer you added birth year 1960. That must be wrong, as I was on high school with Eleonore. She was one year senior to me, and I was born in 1955. Correctuur (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Arbore

Hi, pls see this talkpage where I raise the issue of Luca Arbore's evaluation as low importance. thx --Cei Trei (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anittas. Dahn (talk) 12:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Keren oob

Thanks for rating it, any suggestions for improving it to B class? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Transgender Sex Worker Rating

Hi Johnsoniensis, thanks for taking a look at my article and rating it! I just wanted to pop by and talk a bit more about what issues you saw with the article and how they can be improved. I'd also like to hear why you rated it as low importance. Looking forward to hearing back from you! Brookeenglish (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Please help

Hi John! FYI, the article Cup of Salvation has been nominated for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cup of Salvation). Please help me out. --Omer Toledano (talk) 10:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry I am not able to help you with this.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

---

		The WikiProject Cornwall Barnstar
		For your consistent good works on topics related to Cornwall. Dysklyver 21:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

---

Sarah, Lady Pennington

I noticed that your recent edit of this page removed the term 'noblewoman'. Is this because she married a baronet rather than being born to her rank, or because a baronetcy itself does not qualify, or for some other reason? As an American, I am not well versed in the terminology of European aristocracy, so any guidance appreciated.Alafarge (talk) 19:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for the clarification. Alafarge (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Longevity tag

Thanks for ranking the article Serapheim Savvaitis. I am somewhat puzzled by the longevity tag on the talk page that mentions sanctions. Could you please let me know what this issue is about / how this works, as I do not really understand it? Much appreciated. ΙΣΧΣΝΙΚΑ-888 (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Johnsoniensis. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Johnsoniensis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Johnsoniensis. AfC submissions Random submission 3+ months 2,822 pending submissions to update I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)