User talk:TheTechie/Archives/2024/May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Username policy/RFC 2024

Because you created the page, it won't let me send a thanks, but thanx - FlightTime (open channel) 02:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@FlightTime Thumbs up icon Anytime! Just wanted to see what others thought about my pet peeve. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I have the same pet! lol - FlightTime (open channel) 03:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm confused. I was talking about a pet peeve, but I got info about a pet. Whatever, it's fine. Back to RC patrolling... thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No problem, it's me. I thought it was funny :P - FlightTime (open channel) 03:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh, ok. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Hi TheTechie. Unfortunately, I have just closed your RfC early for a failure to follow WP:RFCBEFORE. I know this is probably disheartening to hear, and I don't want to discourage you. But the RfC encountered immediate and overwhelming negative feedback. I think that could have been avoided if the RfC had been better workshopped ahead of time. That could have allowed you to appropriately understand issues like Unified Login, or the other issues that editors raised. First raising and workshopping the issue so that you at least understand the issue better allows you to create a better RfC (i.e. one with a better, but rarely guaranteed, chance of success). I think any editor who has been around a while has inherently created an RfC that they look back and think "D'oh!" I know that I have created some not so great RfC's (for example, I created a sports RfC at one point...despite not knowing anything about sports...that went over pretty poorly). I hope this can be a learning moment, and I'm sorry to have to be the bearer of bad news. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
    I understand, thank you for the feedback. I probably should have asked on the RFC talk page before creating it. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
    RfC talkpage? I'm not sure what you're referring to. If you mean WT:RFC, that's probably not as helpful as a more well seen, or more topic specific, venue. One of the advantages of say asking at a place like the talk for the policy you're trying to change is that you'll get the page watchers of the policy, who have probably been involved in previous RfCs on the subject. They might still bristle at the idea, but they can at least usually give you a sense of key opposition arguments you will need to consider, or other unforseen issues. In my experience, they'll usually provide some helpful clarification to the RfC wording. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
    Okay. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

CVUA

Hi The Techie, Not sure if you are still interest in CVUA program as you have not answer the last 3 question on assignment 1. If you have any problem regarding the assignment, pls let me know or if you are not interest in the program any more, then also let me know. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 01:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia Kind of busy, will get back soon. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick reply and ping me on the program page at the "communication section" at the bottom of the assignment when you have done with assignment 1. Stay safe and have a good weekend. Cassiopeia talk 01:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Added your gb on a LIST

Hello TheTechie... Added your guestbook here on your behalf. Hasta la vista! Volten001 ☎ 04:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

"That girl is so dangerous" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect That girl is so dangerous has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § That girl is so dangerous until a consensus is reached. Bearcat (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm aware. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 16:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheTechie, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Standard offer info

Template:Standard offer info has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-cyberbully

Template:Uw-cyberbully has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello, thanks for editing my user page :) Akhinesh212 (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

A7 nominations

Hi! You seem to have gone on a recent binge of A7 nominations; some of those seem to be OK, but ... do please understand that A7 only applies when there is no credible claim of significance in the page. This is a much lower threshold than notability – any claim of significance is enough to invalidate the tag. I've declined several of them, left some for others to review. Take care, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Which ones were deleted? If you reply here, please ping me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 21:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
TheTechie, for what's been deleted, please see here. I may have been wrong, perhaps none of the A7 tags were really fully justified – I deleted an A1 and a G11, and declined some A7s. Take care, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Minor edits checkbox

Hi TheTechie :) Just FYI, the minor edits checkbox has a specific meaning on Wikipedia, and refers to edits that could never be subject to a dispute/that only make superficial changes to the page. By my understanding, edits such as this wouldn't meet the criteria to be classed as minor. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 11:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello @A smart kitten. Sorry! I'm usually good with this. Must've misclicked. If you reply here, please ping me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy notice, I'll let you tag the real page

We're definitely patrolling the same category, you left a talk page notice at User talk:MicrobiologyMarcus#Speedy deletion nomination of User:Madhuriceo/sandbox that accidentally tagged the redirect as a result of the page move during an edit conflict. Cheers, microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 00:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@MicrobiologyMarcus Yeah, I was wondering why after I applied a CSD G11 tag, it changed into a redirect. All good though, thanks for checking with me.  Done in regards to CSD tagging.
(PS also I don't know why it notified you, but feel free to remove that.) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 00:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
It notified me, because when I moved the page, I left behind a redirect. The software credits me with that page creation and Twinkle identifies me as the page creator to notify when leaving the CSD talk page message. Pretty standard, just a weird edge case as a result of the edit conflict. Good patrol otherwise, well done. Cheers! microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 00:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Blaze

FWIW, it's possible Blaze didn't know you aren't an admin. As far as I can tell, you made the only comments on their page that seemed to be threatening a block. It's probably best for you to stay out of fraught discussions. Valereee (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't mean it that way. Was trying to get them to cool down after the types of remarks they made at admins. I should probably add a (Non-administrator comment) to discussions like this. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, probably not a bad idea when someone thinks admins are threatening blocks. Valereee (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
@Valereee thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Seeking Guidance on Republishing Sergey Smbatyan's Article on Wikipedia

Hey @TheTechie, thanks for your willingness to help me to improve the Wikipedia. I would be more than thankful, if you guide me how to improve the article and republish it. Thanks in advance. Grigor Khachatrian (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

You asked on Liz's talk page how to make it sound less like an ad. I would remove/change this line so the submission reads less like an ad:
  1. He actively engages in international performances and is dedicated to revitalizing classical music audiences while promoting contemporary classical music on a global scale.
Also, you need much more reliable sources to show notability.
When you're done, please let me know so I can submit it (I accidentally removed the submit button from public view). thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Also @Grigor Khachatrian cite note 15 cannot be multiple sources. Split it into multiple citations. That is all. Like I said, please let me know when you're ready to submit, and you'll get a review (by someone else). thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Dear @TheTechie, thanks for your guidance, it will make the article more neutral, change the multiple citations, and also remove the parts that has been review by AI assistant. And then let you know, thanks so much. Grigor Khachatrian (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

You found a cookie!

Asheiou has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Good work > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 09:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

@Asheiou Hmm, who's {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}? 😜 thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I forgot to substitute 😭 > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 14:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
@Asheiou VV

TheTechie has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}! 

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 15:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding on Draft:Doors (Roblox game)

@TheTechie, this is CSM, an AFC patroller. Just for clarity, I was reviewing the article and found that you had denied twice. From my perspective, the user is failing to address the issues you said on comments. Also he was adding few sources, still not making upto the mark on qualifying this article. I have one question. Is social media (YT, X (twitter), etc.) may not fill the criteria? ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, @CSMention269,
Yes, Twitter and FB, etc. are considered self published sources, so you cannot count them as reliable. If they keep ignoring the AFC comments, feel free to reject the draft, meaning that they cannot resubmit it further (assuming you are an AFC reviewer and have AFC helper, you can just use the decline option, select "reject", then select the option that says "subject is not notable". It'll post a message saying "this subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia".) Feel free to reply with any more questions and thanks for patrolling.
Best, thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanx ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 11:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

iPad Pro Display Citation.

Hello there, I wanted to use "apple.com" as my citation but I was worried its a broad web page and doesn't cover only the iPad, even in the iPad subsection... By the way, what are canned edit summaries? Dulton100 (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

@Dulton100 Please stop copy pasting comments on your talk page to mine. It just makes it more irritating. I have replied on your own talk page. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked socks

Please stop commenting at the Talk pages of blocked socks. It's not helpful, and in some cases what you say is incorrect. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23 Thank you for the explanation. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
You've continued to do this after this message, as well as inappropriately tagging an unblocked user as a sock. Please stop. You are not experienced enough to be dealing with these sorts of issues. Spicy (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
@Spicy Okay. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This is very similar to what I was getting at in the ANI thread where you continued to post on an indefinitely banned user's talk page, requiring that user's talk page access to be revoked. It's unhelpful and disruptive and would be used against you in any RfA. BoldGnome (talk) 02:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
What you say is utterly confusing. Even another admin said there was nothing wrong with it. Please mind your own business, I will work this out with Spicy and Bbb23. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Your attempts to demonstrate your abilities as an administrator hopeful are disruptive and not isolated to commenting on the pages of blocked sock puppets. BoldGnome (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
I accept how my recent edits could be viewed as disruptive, but I don't see how the Lkomdis edit was disruptive. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm just very confused because I was told by an experienced admin in the case of Lkomdis that there was nothing wrong with my edits, please stop blaming a user who is just trying to help this encylopedia, regardless of account age. The Blade of Northern Lights clearly said: I don't see anything wrong with what TheTechie did here, it was Lkomdis who made things weird. Who knows what I might do next, I might just leave Wikipedia, all things considered. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
@Bbb23 @Spicy Sorry about the mishap today, for both writing on a sock talk page (I should've done it on the sockmaster) and the template thing (I got confused as the template "an editor has raised a concern"). My bad. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
The issue isn't that you posted on the sock's talk page instead of the sockmaster's. You should not be making a habit of commenting on the talk pages of blocked users. Spicy (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Iggy Azalea

Sorry, I added it to the talk page, can you see if it’s right please? Ninacaliente (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Note: Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky, per Binksternet. @Binksternet: How did you find this out, please explain. Why are you saying this and how do you know? thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheTechie/Archives/2024/May&oldid=1225339838"