Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arasp Kazemian

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arasp Kazemian[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Arasp Kazemian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. There's some Youtube videos of him speaking (hosted on his Youtube channel with very little context), a Quora question posted by the subject asking a question about his philosophical opinions in third person, and apparently he translated a book (but the source provided is goodreads, which is not reliable, and anyhow just having translated a book does not imply notability). As an additional note, the article has also been previously deleted twice by CSD A7. signed, Rosguill talk 21:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The funny fact is that Googleread is not reliable source! but at the same time, Google check which has sent to iran and its picture is not reliable too. Google Adsense is not reliable too ! QUite funny! Google is not reliable at all, because sending check to Iran and causing problem to an Iranian professor does not sound good to public opinion! That is the fact ! Parsbyte (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably the funniest thing I've ever been accused of. signed, Rosguill talk 23:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 03:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 03:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 03:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: even if there is no notability in the philosophy part (Although He is on one of our professors in western philosophy in Sohanak University. The part about getting a check from Google is very very notable! I hope the American and Russian mafia in the Wikipedia understand this. 2A01:5EC0:2025:DC99:5C32:991:B9BA:A0FF (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: RS does not support the subject. According to Notability (people),it is not considered a notable person.M1nhm (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Keep it, but it does not really matter. Wikipedia is losing its reputation, you can check it on Alexa website. We are in wikipedia were Sexual partner is listed! and one of the philosophers in the world should be deleted. It is funny!Parsbyte (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Zero in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 13:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A person does not become a notable philosopher until they have published some books or articles which are sufficiently cited and commented on to show that they are in fact notable. This passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:GNG/. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arasp_Kazemian&oldid=1221050482"