The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. (The list essentially exists at List of highest-grossing films; I don't think users would want us to create a special list with only those that have grossed one billion dollars, since it would simply be taking a portion of this list and transferring it to a new article. Perhaps a separate list could be desirable once all of those listed on the existing list have grossed more than $1 billion.). Good Ol’factory(talk) 05:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Delete. WP:ARBITRARYCAT. Notable figure for an article or infobox, but not for a separate category, I think. Brandmeistertalk 21:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Listify - a billion dollars was more defining a decade ago than it is now, due to rising prices. And of course, shouldn't be a cat per WP:ARBITRARYCAT. - jc37 16:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Listify. I would also point out that as both the world popualtion rises, and the marketing of films into added regions, the ability to grosse 1 billion expands even if prices do not. Of course, the big way to up prices is to make the film 3-D.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. MER-C 10:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant and possibly misleading category, in my opinion. There's no evidence that some specific noble titles valid only in Bohemia ever existed. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. MER-C 10:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT. Although the category contains 4 entries, there is only one family member in it. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - small cat with unclear inclusion criteria. Maybe the 2 villages are historical Stillfried possessions, but the connection is too vague to be useful, let alone defining. Additionally, one of the 4 entries is a redirect to a disambig page. GermanJoe (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
