The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:upmerge to Category:Marquess stubs and the respective "Peerage of [X] stubs" category. -- Black Falcon(talk) 03:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Collectively, these four categories hold enough articles to fill a single stub category. Individually, each is well undersized. Propose deleting all four categories. Double-upmerge templates to Category:Marquess stubs and the respective "Peerage of..." category. Dawynn (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Category:Marquess stubs. There is not enough content for the split. The two I looked at seemed to be rather more than stubs anyway. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. -- Black Falcon(talk) 02:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians interested in Ranch Style Brand Beans[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This user category is populated by {{User:Mike409/RSBB}} and groups users on the basis of liking a particular brand of beans. As such, it is not a legitimate "interest" category but rather overcategorization on the basis of an irrelevant preference (and a very narrow one at that) that does not provide a basis for collaboration to improve the encyclopedia. It should go without saying, but simply liking a food does not imply an interest in collaborating on articles related to it. -- Black Falcon(talk) 05:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
