Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 14 November 16 >

November 15[edit]

Category:St Mungo Prize recipients[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 09:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OCAWARD. The St Mungo Prize is a prize awarded triennially to the person who has done most to improve and promote the city of Glasgow. The winners have been listified in the main article. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Interesting but non-defining award as far as I can tell. Fiamh (talk, contribs) 20:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:National parks in Conwy County Borough[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:National parks in Conwy County Borough

Category:Iraqi Kurdistan stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 09:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge (by editing the template), unnecessary small stub categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - No reason to have small stub categories. --Semsurî (talk) 21:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - very small, and even the Kurdish parent stub cats are pretty small. Unnecessary split. Grutness...wha? 23:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Semsûrî and Grutness: I have added a third stub category to the nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support as well. --Semsurî (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. Grutness...wha? 02:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video game downloadable content packs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 09:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "Packs" is unnecessary in the title, per the main article name, downloadable content. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Honest no idea why "packs" was included when I created it over 2 years ago. Might have been creating it from a redlink I found. -- ferret (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Alexandra IDVtalk 17:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Comedy game shows[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:Comedy game shows

Category:Speakers of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:Speakers of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament

Category:Venetian archaeological sites in Greece[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:Venetian archaeological sites in Greece

Category:Powermasters[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:Powermasters

Category:Shire (Middle-earth)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 12#Category:Shire (Middle-earth)

Category:Ruined churches of World War II[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 24#Category:Ruined churches of World War II

Category:Childbirth in Uganda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge childbirth tree to the maternity tree. No consensus for midwifery by country. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The maternity tree is better populated and has a slightly wider scope. Rathfelder (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are barely any articles in either of the "By country" subcategories for either childbirth or midwifery. Maternity has wider scope. Rathfelder (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Rathfelder, is the proposal supposed to be for merging Category:Midwifery by country to Category:Maternity by country? And apart from the Uganda category, are you suggesting changes to any of the other existing subcats? --Paul_012 (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies I've been looking through these categories. I think Category:Maternity by country is viable, and there are sufficient country articles in it. I had thought to leave the individual country articles for later consideration, but I cant see anything in the Childbirth by country categories which couldn't happily fit into the appropriate maternity category. I'm not so sure about the midwifery articles. Rathfelder (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support most but Keep midwifery separate. We also have a midwives by country tree, which is well populated. It may be that some midwifery material needs purging from the maternity tree. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm quite happy to leave the midwifery proposal for now. Rathfelder (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Horror rock[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Selective merge to Category:Horror punk. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: According to the article for horror punk, horror rock is just another name for it. Is there a reason why there is a category for each? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The horror punk article may say that, but I'm not sure it's true. Looking at the contents of Category:Horror rock and Category:Horror punk, they share basically none of the same bands, and there does appear to be a clear distinction between them. It feels like a tough case to make, if (via the merge) we're going to present the likes of Glenn Danzig and Alice Cooper as "Horror punk" acts. (Update: Merging in the other direction might make more sense, as all punk is rock, but not all rock is punk.) -- FeRDNYC (talk) 10:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But horror rock redirects to horror punk, and I don't really find anything online that discusses "horror rock" (except a list by VH1), but there are multiple discussions and articles on what "horror punk" is, such as Rebel Circus, Rate Your Music, Ultimate Guitar and Daily Collegian. Besides merging, parsing will be necessary as well. Alice Cooper, for example, being more glam rock and shock rock as horror rock/horror punk isn't even mentioned in his article, but horror punk is mentioned in Danzig's article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: You're right, I boned that one. I should've really mentioned Danzig rather than Glenn Danzig, but of course Danzig isn't listed at Category:Horror rock. Glenn Danzig started out with the Misfits and Samhain, basically creating "horror punk" — and as such, he's correctly listed in Category:Horror punk musicians.
Anyway, my larger point is that Category:Horror rock was likely created because, despite the Horror punk article's equivocation (which was added by an IP user back in 2010), like I said "not all rock is punk". You'll notice that Category:Horror rock contains the Horror punk article, and Category:Horror punk as a subcategory, but the reverse is not true. It also contains subcats which may or may not be appropriate to list as subcats of Category:Horror punk. (Both Category:Psychobilly and Category:Deathrock are listed at Category:Punk rock genres, alongside Category:Horror punk, which seems the correct hierarchy on that front.)
I guess what I'm saying is, Category:Horror rock may be useful or not, as it stands, but merging it into Category:Horror punk doesn't seem like it would serve any purpose except to arguably pollute that category with things that may not belong there. The things that do belong in Category:Horror punk are already there, or in subcats. IMHO, one could make an easier argument for just deleting Category:Horror rock outright as non-notable / minor, and allowing the various pages and subcats within to just remain reachable via the otherwise-established hierarchy. (It's not like any of these pages are lacking in WP:OVERCAT.) But since I realize that merges tend to be easier to sell than deletions, typically, I suppose a "merge" that actually adds (almost?) none of Category:Horror rock to Category:Horror punk — which I suspect would be the outcome of said merge, once the dust settled — would be a workable compromise. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So merge but with cleanup needed because not all the content in horror rock belongs in horror punk. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support with some reservations, as discussed above. --- FeRDNYC (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Animated television series about teenagers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: do not rename. MER-C 10:31, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To follow the scheme of categories in Category:Teen television series. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
True, although that entire scheme was created only a few months ago and there is no scheme for "teenager" categories. There is, however, Category:Works about adolescence, which contains Category:Teen films and the aforementioned Category:Teen television series. Perhaps there should be Category:Films about adolescence and Category:Television series about adolescence and this one can be renamed to Category:Animated television series about adolescence. Deletion is also an option. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As long as they're all renamed to be consistent, anything should be fine. "_ about adolescence" sounds slightly better to me than "Teen _" because it's a bit more precise (e.g. is a "teen film" a film for a teenage audience or have teenage main characters?), and more true to the idea than "_ about teenagers" (adolescence as opposed to literally having an age between 14 and 19). — MarkH21 (talk) 23:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "about" form which is less ambiguous. No preference between teens and adolescents. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "about" form I agree with marco that it's less ambigous since the proposed title doesn't make it clear if teens are the subject matter or the audiance while the current title does. Slight preference for adolescence per Marks comment above, but both adolescence and teenagers are fine. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Agrarian politics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. MER-C 09:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Agrarianism is a political movement; most of the articles in the category (eg Georgism) are political in nature. I'm not sure how "agrarian politics" differs from "agrarianism". Fiamh (talk, contribs) 08:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, agrarianism is a very specific political philosophy, while the nominated category has a much broader scope. Possibly rename to Category:Agriculture and politics, possibly move some of the content from one category to the other. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Charlotte City Council members[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Category:Charlotte City Council members

Category:Eye[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: do not rename. MER-C 09:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Opposed CFDS. This seems to also be a set category since Category:Eyes in culture now exists and the Common category is also at Category:Eyes, there is also Category:Eye, Suffolk so Category:Eye can become a DAB just like Commons:Category:Eyes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - this is a topic category as can be seen immediately by glancing at the subcats (such as Category:Eye care) (another topic category). The present name is just perfect. Oculi (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is about all eye-related articles, not just eyes themselves. JIP | Talk 12:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for the reasons above. This is for eye-related topics, not for the eyes themselves. See also the categories for Ear, Face, Head, Mouth, Nose... Grutness...wha? 23:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_15&oldid=931722721"