Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 30 February 1 >

January 31[edit]

Category:Wikipedians interest in energy drink[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Food, drink, and consumables * Pppery * it has begun... 23:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Founders of philosophical traditions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, the definition of what constitutes a "founder" or a "philosophical tradition" is so vague that these people will have little in common other than "being very famous" - car chasm (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Museums in Fort Collins, Colorado[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category contains only 1 entry, as does Category:Museums in Larimer County, Colorado. User:Namiba 23:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't make sense to merge into another category which is also too small to justify existence.--User:Namiba 17:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Feel free to nominate that category for merging too. While it still exists it should be populated though. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added it to this nomination.--User:Namiba 20:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Philosophical traditions and Category:Philosophical movements[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "School" and "tradition" and "movement" are mostly synonymous words that are all used interchangeably. Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of any one of the three labels. - car chasm (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect and rename — per Fayenatic london, leave a redirect on the merged categories. Rename the others without redirect.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 08:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bronze Age literature[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 12#Category:Bronze Age literature

Category:Critics of Marxism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Critics of Marxism

Category:Flavin enzymes and Category:Flavoprotein enzymes to Category:Flavoproteins[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The categories are synonyms; the shortest and most established name is Flavoprotein; the word 'enzyme' is a pleonasm. --TadejM my talk 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Flavoprotein is the common term. ― Synpath 07:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ice hockey in Savannah, Georgia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Only 2 articles, unlikely to grow. No opposition to recreation w/ growth. User:Namiba 16:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of foreign relations of Romania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: same. 寒吉 (talk) 11:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Presocratic philosophical literature[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Presocratic philosophical literature

Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete/Merge Timrollpickering (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Very recently created category that does not meet WP:CATDEFINING. While stations can generally be said to be above or below ground, they are not commonly and consistently referred to as such. AFAICT, these were all recently created by a single editor without discussion.
Delete where already categorized by line. Upmerge where the stations are not already in another subcategory.
See recent:
  1. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Category:SkyTrain (Vancouver) stations located above ground
  2. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 11#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  3. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 12#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  4. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 23#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Social critics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic, anyone who has ever criticized interactions between two or more people could be considered a "social critic" - car chasm (talk) 05:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not a defining characteristic. Subjects of articles have vaguely in common that they criticized aspects of modern society. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like video game characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:OC/U#Irrelevant likes. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in video games or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 12:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark (talk) 02:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like PlayStation 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by computer hardware/WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by electronic device. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in PlayStation. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark (talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like Newgrounds[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by website. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function, would arguable be overly narrow scope even if worded collaboratively as "Wikipedians interested in <film name>. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in film or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark (talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_31&oldid=1138920561"