Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 10
October 12 >

October 11[edit]

Category:Wilson family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 (talk) 01:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I took the liberty to merge all these nominations. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    (Thanks!) Mason (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom --Lenticel (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Atiyah family as it has 3 entries. GiantSnowman 17:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your reasoning. My rule of thumb has been to use 4ish as the threshold, if there wasn't an eponymous article. Mason (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Family of Charles Sturt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat, that only seems to exist because theirs an eponymous category about a family member Mason (talk) 23:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Androgens and anabolic steroids[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Androgens and anabolic steroids

Category:Sahrawi men by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Sahrawi men. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 (talk) 01:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: overcategorized Mason (talk) 20:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Battles involving Polisario Front[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Category has been filled with a dozen articles. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 22:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: small cat Mason (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:LGBT Bahá'ís[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:EGRS/I issue: the intersection of religion and sexuality/gender identity is not defining here. Edward-Woodrow • talk 17:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British scholars[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:British scholars

Category:Destroyed towns[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and rename (or merge both, however you want to put it.) (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 15:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems to be an arbitrary distinction, destination category could be renamed to "destroyed settlements". –DMartin 18:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. per nom Mason (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Since there is a proposal to use a name that is not the title of the merge target, I have tagged the target category as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge both?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that merging both is a great suggestion. Towns and cities aren't really the core feature of the category, like a destroyed place is destroyed regardless of whether it's a town or city. Mason (talk) 19:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support new "merge both" suggestion. --Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kofun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 14:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Title should be plural not singular Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 01:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The first paragraph of the Kofun article says "Kofun were mainly constructed in ..." suggesting that Kofun can be used as plural. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Kofun is both singular and plural. The term "kofuns" does not exist in academia. --MChew (talk) 01:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Phantom islands of the Atlantic[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Phantom islands of the Atlantic

Expatriates in the Kingdom of Prussia, part 2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Expatriates in the Kingdom of Prussia, part 2

Category:Sports museums in insular areas of the United States[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Sports museums in insular areas of the United States

Category:Lists of museums in insular areas of the United States[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Lists of museums in insular areas of the United States

Category:Galician toponymic surnames[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Galician toponymic surnames

Category:Even-toed ungulates[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Even-toed ungulates

Category:Odd-toed ungulates[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Odd-toed ungulates

Category:Places in the deuterocanonical books[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Places in the deuterocanonical books

Category:Antiquarians from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English antiquarians. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Art patrons from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English art patrons. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Businesspeople from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English businesspeople. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Merchants from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English merchants. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chefs from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English chefs. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Clockmakers from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English clockmakers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Explorers from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English explorers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
clarification. Trivial intersection isn't the right phrase: redundant/overlapping. Mason (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historians from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • MergeDelete per nom. (This one is really silly) –Aidan721 (talk) 20:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    (I agree, although I think the chef on is the silliest. My litmus test is to ask myself whether the political regime meaningfully intersects with the occupation. Mostly it doesn't...) Mason (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Aidan721, did you mean to !vote delete per nom, or did you have a merge target in mind? HouseBlastertalk 02:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lawyers from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English lawyers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
clarification. Trivial intersection isn't the right phrase: redundant/overlapping, especially when there are Xth-century English lawyers. Mason (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Magicians from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English magicians. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Maids of honour from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English courtiers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 16:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mathematicians from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Writers from the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Military personnel of the Kingdom of England[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Military personnel of the Kingdom of England

Category:English navy officers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:English navy officers

Category:People of the Kingdom of England in Bermuda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close. Category was merged due to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 5#Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the Kingdom of England in the Thirteen Colonies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: trivial intersection Mason (talk) 04:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bodies dissected at Winchester Medical College[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: listify and then delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:TRIVIAL. The location of a body when or if it is dissected is a non-defining characteristic. User:Namiba 19:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete. is indeed trivial Mason (talk) 01:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Listify - Actually, in this case, where the bodies were, was notable. See also Burning of Winchester Medical College, etc. That said, the current title doesn't give any sense of the significance. So it would need to be renamed at the very least. But when I was considering rename possibilities, it became clear that the entries really could use some clarification, and so, per WP:BEFORECAT, this should probably be a list. - jc37 01:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: delete or listify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I do not have an issue with listification before deletion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm fine with listification, as it's a pretty novel list. Mason (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Russian and Soviet emigrants to Albania[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Russian and Soviet emigrants to Albania

Category:Officials of the medieval Islamic world[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus for nominator's proposal. There is consensus to rename them both to "Foo in the medieval Islamic world". (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Category:Viziers of the medieval Islamic world (closed as no consensus). As closer suggested, we should start over. The basic argument remains the same: the "medieval Islamic world" was not a "country", but we can rearrange these categories as part of the Category:Medieval people by occupation tree. I did all the preparatory work this time, following Marcocapelle's successful Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 18#Heads of government. I created Category:Medieval government officials as the merge target and populated and parented it already, as well as creating the new Category:Government officials by century tree to go along with it.
The Officials cat will be a simple Merge. The Viziers cat will be a simple Rename. NLeeuw (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle and Fayenatic london: pinging participants of previous discussion for follow-up. NLeeuw (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still oppose and I am not sure there is any merit in starting this over. I have argued before that 1) there is no need for categorizing by country per se and 2) that categorization by cultural region is the most convenient solution for not having countries altogether. The medieval islamic world was mostly organized by short-living dynasties with varying territories, not by stable countries where one dynasty succeeded another while the country remained the same like in Europe. Many dynasty categories do not have enough biography articles for a very detailed subcategorization by occupation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Marcocapelle I'm sad that you don't agree. As a historian, I must object to the simplistic idea that [in Europe, there were] stable countries where one dynasty succeeded another while the country remained the same. That is a very modern Western European point of view. I've spent many years writing about war of succession, and List of wars of succession in Europe. As I wrote some years ago, Moreover, the legal and political coherence of the various provinces of a 'state territory' [in Europe] often consisted merely in nothing more than having a common ruler (a personal union). Early government systems were therefore based on dynasties, the extinction of which immediately brought on a state crisis. And: Early medieval Europe was rife with conflicts over property or property rights. R. I. Moore (2000) characterised the situation as 'apparently endless and pointless internecine conflict which raged at every level of aristocratic society from the tenth century onwards. It continued everywhere in Latin Europe (though taking a somewhat different form to the east of the Rhine) throughout the eleventh century, and did not subside in most regions until well into the twelfth.' Countless dynasty-based states in Europe collapsed precisely due to succession disputes, and some of the worst wars in European history such as the War of the Spanish Succession were, as the name hints, caused by dynastic succession crises. A serious argument can be made that there have been more dynastic wars of succession than religious wars in Europe. We've just forgotten about them, because nobody (in Europe) remembers what absolute monarchy was like, but we do still know what religious conflict looks like. Anyway, perhaps this is a topic we should discuss privately, because I risk going offtopic here, even though I think it's important to explain why I think you are mistaken. Just like "the medieval Islamic world", Europe has always been dynastically unstable (until we invented constitutional monarchies and republics). NLeeuw (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree that the statement was simplistic. There are also enough cases of unstable, small and/or short-living polities in medieval Europe. But that merely strengthens my argument, because in those cases historiography also often focuses on a longer lasting cultural region, and so we have categories for Anglo-Saxons, for Kievan Rus' people and (more dubious) for medieval Italians. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since these have been re-nominated, how about renaming to "in" following the precedent for monarchs in continents? i.e. to Category:Officials in the medieval Islamic world and Category:Viziers in the medieval Islamic world. – Fayenatic London 14:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with the rename, that is slightly more precise. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 21:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: alt rename to "in"?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Defunct charter high schools in California[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete/triple merge as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. Only 1 article. Delete the container category as it will then be empty. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Charter preparatory schools in the United States by state or territory[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Charter preparatory schools in the United States by state or territory

Category:Emigrants from the United Kingdom of the Netherlands to France[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete both. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 16:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1 article (Wilhelm Hendrik Franquinet) for which this is not defining. This 3-line biography tells us that Franquinet, born in Maastricht in 1785, educated in Antwerp, lived and worked in Maastricht in from 1804 to 1816, and settled in Paris in 1816. I doubt that the gap between the formation of the UK of the Netherlands in September 1815 and an unknwown date in 1816 allows us to consider that the nominated category appropriately describes someone that was, in fact, French before and after this "emigration". Place Clichy (talk) 14:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Czech Marxist poets[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Czech Marxist poets

Category:Russian business families[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Russian families. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: one family in the category Mason (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shoigu family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Henry family of the Cook Islands[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 12:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sommaruga family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political families of Vietnam[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Vietnamese families and Category:Political families. Nom proposed splitting, but then called for upmerging; given that there is only a single page in the category that would belong in both merge targets I am taking the distinction between a split and a dual merge to be semantics. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only one family in this category, should be upmerged. not opposition, if the category is beomes populated Mason (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dual merge per nom. Likewise no objection to recreation of the category if and when it can be populated better. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Businesspeople of the Spanish Netherlands[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Businesspeople from the Spanish Netherlands. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: @From country/nationality not of country/nationality Mason (talk) 12:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shanty towns in Zambia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I feel it is unnecessary duplication to have both categories with the same articles. GeographicAccountant (talk) 11:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Disappeared detainees in Chile[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: At first I thought that this recently created category was a duplicate of existing Category:Enforced disappearances in Chile, but the four articles there are in fact more generic to the Chile dictatorship rather than just the disappearances: 1973 Chilean coup d'état, Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional, Human rights abuses in Chile under Augusto Pinochet, Military dictatorship of Chile. Place Clichy (talk) 09:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hawaiian Airlines personnel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Hawaiian Airlines people. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Near-empty un-categorized duplicate category. Place Clichy (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Paul Malliavin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Paul Malliavin

Category:Zainichi Korean male professional wrestlers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Zainichi Korean male professional wrestlers

Category:Linha do Alentejo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete without prejudice against recreation if it can be populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improperly-named WP:SMALLCAT that was created just to hold one template that consists almost entirely of redlinks. Even if this were warranted, the template's naming as {{Alentejo Line stations}} cleary indicates that the topic has an English-language name, which would in turn mean that any category for it would also have to use that English-language name rather than a Portuguese name -- so no prejudice against future recreation of a Category:Alentejo Line once there are at least five things to file in it, but the category shouldn't be named in Portuguese and isn't needed just to hold a single template. Bearcat (talk) 04:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now per nom. There are very few articles about railway stations in Portugal to begin with and most of them are on the Algarve Line. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now. Although the main article is at Linha do Alentejo, there is just not enough content related to this railway line at this point. Place Clichy (talk) 05:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This should be a category for mainspace articles so the template doesn't belong here. This is basically an empty category, alhough I suppose Barreiro railway station should be included. Still, that's a really small category that's not needed currently. Pichpich (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films set in Tirunelveli district[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Films set in Tamil Nadu without prejudice against recreation if it can be populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT created for just one film. As always, every place that exists does not automatically get its own dedicated "films set in [there]" the moment one film exists to file in it -- there would have to be at least five films to file here before a category was justified, and below five the films should just be categorized at the Tamil Nadu level. Navigation of the Wikipedia is not aided by obsessively winnowing everything down into narrow microcategories of one. Bearcat (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now with no prejudice to recreation when more articles can be added. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Japan's scenic spots[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Japan's scenic spots

Category:Family coats of arms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge "Foo family coats of arms" into "Foo coats of arms". (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: small, overlapping categories that's not distinct from Coats of arms. Mason (talk) 04:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Coats of arms are usually associated with families! Although there are circumstances in which minor members of a family would take a modified coat of arms, and coats of arms attributed to organizations such as cities, I believe that to be the exception rather than the norm. @Smasongarrison: I took the liberty to combine three near-identical nominations, please revert that if I did not respect your intention. Place Clichy (talk) 05:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for taking the initiative!!!! I appreciate it! Mason (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Beauregard, Alabama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a small town without the volume of spinoff content needed to justify an eponymous category. The only thing that's been filed here is one event that certainly affected the town but wasn't limited to only that town alone, and the only other possible contents (based on a scan of the town's "what links here") are the town itself and one high school in it -- but that would only be three things, still falling short of the five things it takes to warrant an eponymous category. Bearcat (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. per nom Mason (talk) 04:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Creator requests delete I apologize for not knowing the rules about categories. I'll do better in the future. ChessEric 17:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, creator is fine with deletion --Lenticel (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete now that the creator supports deletion. Pichpich (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Radio in the Faroe Islands[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Radio in Denmark. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 14:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat Mason (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American lawyers of Lebanese descent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. As one of the votes said, wikipedia is not in the business of righting great wrongs. (non-admin closure) Seawolf35 (talk) 01:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Triple intersections of nationality, occupation and ethnicity, each created solely to overcategorize one or two people. Per WP:CATEGRS, people are not typically defined by this intersection of traits -- there isn't, for instance, any particular evidence that lawyers of Lebanese descent do the job differently than lawyers of Italian, Japanese, German, Finnish or Indonesian descent do, or that musicians of Nigerian descent sing differently than musicians of Ghanaian, Congolese or Liberian descent. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Singers are defined by the genre or style of their music, not their ancestry. Place Clichy (talk) 06:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, trivial intersections. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for attorneys of Lebanese descent, it helps avoid stereotypes of Arab communities, especially with what is happening in the Middle East right now. It helps people to understand that the Arab-speaking communities are of a diverse collection of cultures, and that there are people from their community that have good jobs as educated professionals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starlighsky (talk • contribs)
  • Delete as I don't think that this intersection is defining. Also please remember to sign your comments. Mason (talk) 18:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as it appears that categories pertaining to American legal professionals of Middle Eastern descent in general are underrepresented. Montgomery28 21:47:20 UTC, 11 October 2023
  • Delete as trivial intersections. I would add that Starlighsky's argument above that we should keep the Lebanese lawyers category to right wrong perceptions is an extremely weak one. Montgomery28 seems to make a similar argument though I don't quite understand what they mean. Pichpich (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete as trivial intersections. As a human being, I agree with the sentiments expressed by the two keep !voters, but Wikipedia is not in the business of righting great wrongs (in this case, underrepresentation of these minorities in American lawyers). HouseBlastertalk 00:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Atabekian family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 00:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Khuzani family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shahristani family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 02:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat without a corresponding eponymous article about the family Mason (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_11&oldid=1181006887"