Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 28[edit]

Category:Salvadoran LGBT people by gender identity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge as there's only one category in here. (No prejudice for recreation if the category grows larger) Mason (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Siblings with two subcategories may also be nominated. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • different merging Category:Peruvian LGBT people by gender identity with Category:Peruvian LGBT people by sexual orientation and rename. Siblings with two subcategories may also be merged too. 대한민국 정치 (talk) 11:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Sexual orientation and identity are different. I would not support merging them together. The SO category for Peru has 3 child categories in it, and that's typical for the category. Mason (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, that would be an inappropriate merge target. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    instead of merging, why not create a supercategory for "by sexual orientation" and "by gender identity"? such as "by identity", encompassing both concepts. then there will be "Peruvian people by identity", with "...by sexual orientation" as subcategory or merged/renamed.
    the typical for the "by gender identity" is two subcategories, which is debatable too. Militanza (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BWF awards[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAWARDAidan721 (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 00:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ithaca Bombers baseball seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One article. Unlikely to grow as Ithaca is not NCAA Division III. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, there is no navigational benefit. No objection to recreation of the category when there are a lot more articles about this. Many sibling categories may be nominated for the same reason. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Plymouth Pilgrims players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a defining characteristic for any of these players. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 12:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Paintings of Venice[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Category:Paintings of Venice

Category:2018–2022 Arab protests[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy rename (C2D). (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per Second Arab Spring. Charles Essie (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bollywood film clans[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Category:Bollywood film clans

Category:MAL Family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unclear what this category is for. It seems connected to people from the Mal (caste). I'd be open to rename suggestions or changes of scope. Mason (talk) 20:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, there are only two articles that do not even link to each other. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Arab diasporas in the Arab world[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The tree for the Middle East is much more developed. Here are only three entries they all are also in the Middle East. Yorkporter (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Blue flowers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category seems a clear case of Over Categorization, specifically Subjective inclusion criteria, as plant flower colors are often categorized differently by different people. What is clearly a blue flower to one author is a purple flower to another writer since there is no hard division between the color hues. Additionally, almost all blue/purple flowers will also have a white form, many partially blue flowers have patterns or stripes of other colors on the flowers, and/or have different colors at different stages of development. E.g. Mertensia virginica, which in addition to being blue also can have pink or white flowers. Iris missouriensis which has flower that might be fairly called purple and has white parts on the falls between dark blue or purple veins. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 17:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The color "blue" itself is not well-defined. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom Mason (talk) 12:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom Gderrin (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Soil pH can influence flower color; Hydrangeas are well known to produce blue flowers in more acidic soils, and to produce purple or pink flowers in more basic soils. Blue pigments in plants are mostly anthocyanins which appear in different shades depending on pH. I'm not aware of very many plants that have a response in flower color that is as strongly affected (blue to pink) by soil pH alone as hydrangeas. I am aware of more plants with anthocyanin pigments that vary dramatically in shade (blue to pink) over the course of floral development (such as Mertensia mentioned above) or vary less dramatically (blue/purple or purple/pink) among different individual plants (which could be genetically or environmentally mediated). "Blue" is the worst possible color category for flowers. Plantdrew (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom Eucalyptusmint (talk) 19:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:ROK nationalism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Creation of this category is possibly restriction evasion. Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Placed by the Wikipedia community, User:Storm598 was banned. "There is a consensus from the community to ban User:Storm598 from the topic of American politics, all eras, broadly construed."
On the other way, meaning to the catoegory is dubious and "ROK-aligned Korean nationalism" and "a nationalism which support the view: South Korea is a distinct nation with previous Korea" are not same.
Only Dawn of Liberty Party support that South Korea is a distinct nation with previous Korea. Other conservative movements support Korean nationalism and think that South Korea and North Korea are single nation but North Korean governmwnt is illegal and North Korean authorities deprive wealth of North Koreans. For example, meaning of Liberal Unification Party is Liberal Unification(자유통일), Which means Korean Unification by liberalization to rescue North Korean.
Category containing only one article is inappropriate. 대한민국 정치 (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Storm598 had a bad track record, I'm still dealing with their stuff. Using the abbreviation "ROK" is also not great toobigtokale (talk) 17:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Category:Korean nationalism already exists and if a sub category is needed it should be "Republic of Korea" rather than ROK. Editors in this area can decide if a new category is needed in the future. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hiroomote Elementary School alumni[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not defining. It's also weird to have this category when we don't even have an article on this primary school. Pichpich (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, we should not have alumni by primary school categories altogether. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, supporting the nominator's proposal. The fact that the school may not be notable enough for an article is a clear signal that the category is not needed. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia does not categorize alumni by primary school. Gjs238 (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Toyota dealerships[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pointless category - contains only the eponymous page and redirects to it. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the purpose of a category is to help readers find similar articles and this category seems not to fulfill a need for that as everything in the category is a redirect to Toyota dealerships (Japan) as noted by the nom. I also cannot find any other categories for Ford, GM, or BMW. There are also very few dealership articles on Wikipedia generally since most of them lack notability. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 18:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dukes in Russia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, all content belongs in the target. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Russia has never had dukes as part of its nobility. Furius (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the proposed deletion. I looked a large portion of the wikipedia articles with both "duke" and "Russian" and the one article that listed a member of Russian nobility as a "duke" looks like it may be an error of translation and the rest were "grand dukes" or were dukes in other countries like Germany. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Islamic rule in the Indian subcontinent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename per article title Muslim period in the Indian subcontinent. An RM in order to change the article title led to no consensus. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People by continent and ethnic or national descent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, more concise and same format as sibling categories, e.g. Category:People by country of descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Beauty pageants for people of specific ethnic or national descents[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Category:Beauty pageants for people of specific ethnic or national descents

Category:People with obsessive–compulsive disorder[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Category:People with obsessive–compulsive disorder

Category:Straits Settlements cricket people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:New Zealand Māori men[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Category:New Zealand Māori men

Category:Laotian LGBT people by century[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as there's only one category in each Mason (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Straits Settlements people by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as there are only two categories here and the parent category isn't crowded Mason (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chamorro people by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as there's only one category in here Mason (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kawthoolei[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is no content here other than Portal:Kawthoolei. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Javier Milei[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON - not enough content. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Parc aérostatique de Chalais-Meudon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Huh? * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
what are the reasons of the deletion or renaming of that category ? Rbmn (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, only one article, no objection to recreation when there are a lot more articles about it. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update, the category has been populated with lots of articles that are not about the Parc aérostatique de Chalais-Meudon, so still delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Historical photographs of Sudan[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 5#Historical photographs of Sudan

Category:Jakabaring Sport City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON - only two pages. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2024 Indian general election[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No actual content in this tree other than templates that don't belong in mainspace categories. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 2024 elections are just approaching (In May 2024, possible before). Will grow with every passing day. Its just made before-hand. Although I have added pages.Shaan SenguptaTalk 05:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now, no objection to recreate the category after there is a significant amount of articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. WP:SMALLCAT for now. Clyde [trout needed] 02:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the Niger Coast Protectorate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: underpopulated, overlapping category. The ncp existed from 1884 until 1900. Mason (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rabbis of Lubavitch[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only one article and has no parents - pointless. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete . Also I think it's overlapping with Category:Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis Mason (talk) 04:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rabbis of Chabad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only one article and has no parents - pointless. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, same as nomination above. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    delete . Also I think it's overlapping with Category:Chabad-Lubavitch rabbi Mason (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Concordia Eagles baseball players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only a redirect and has no parents - pointless. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cricket articles needing attention only to structure[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (G7). (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty category with no parents that doesn't appear to be populated by any specific template. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Sir William Schlich Memorial Award[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: If there's no article on the award then this can't possibly satisfy WP:OCAWARD. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unreferenced Backpacking articles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Clyde [trout needed] 02:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty category with no parents that doesn't appear to be populated by any specific template. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.