Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 25 May 27 >

May 26[edit]

Category:Central intelligence agency associate deputy directors of operations for counterintelligence[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and merge contents to Category:People of the Central Intelligence Agency. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: unnecessary and has wrong capitalization — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heroeswithmetaphors (talk • contribs) 23:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of association football stadiums in Canada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Similar rationale as here. See also Category:Soccer in Canada. DB1729 (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, in Canada we use 'soccer'. GiantSnowman 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Canadian language as cultural identity. --Just N. (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Association football in Canada lists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Similar rationale as here. See also Category:Soccer in Canada. DB1729 (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Record labels owned by women[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 June 3#Category:Record labels owned by women

Category:RobTop Games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: not necessary; only has one article and probably won't have any others IlSoupylI (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Flemish theologians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: disperse contents and delete. One sub-category was omitted, so I have made a procedural nomination at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_16#Category:Flemish_Calvinist_and_Reformed_theologians. – Fayenatic London 06:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Sarepta, Louisiana[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small one county community with just one entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. I couldn't find any more. Grutness...wha? 03:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom and Smallcat. Thank you Grutness for trying. --Just N. (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge no reason to have this one article entry. Especially when the target will only have 8 direct entries after the merger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Church Lads' and Church Girls' Brigade members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:TRIVIALCAT)
The Church Lads' and Church Girls' Brigade is an Anglican Church youth group formed in 1978 with the merger of some predecessor organizations. None of the 3 articles in this category are defined by mere membership: Francis Grenfell was the head of a predecessor organization, Lawrence of Arabia was a member at his local parish church, while the Noel Mellish article makes no mention of it. WP:SMALLCAT is not an issue here though because, even I couldn't find membership numbers, participation is widespread. The problem is that being dropped off by your parents for a meeting just isn't defining. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, just membership of an organization is hardly ever defining. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete membership in a church youh organization is not defining. We do not even have say Category:Boy Scouts of America members although I think we have Category:Eagle Scouts since that is at least a little defining. At least there we did not have as direct an issue that membership was defined as active participants in a given religion. In the US virtually all male youth members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints were boy scouts until then end of 2019 (at least for those 8-13 inclusive), but the majority of members were affilited through other ways (and some of the scouts in troops sponsored by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints were not members of the Church). Many of the people the Church enrolled did absolutely no scouting activity at all (the Church not the individuals paid membership dues), and even those who did some scouting some did very little. Even with Eagle Scouts the connection to scouting is at times very minor in their overall biography, but reaching that rank does represent multiple years of deep engagement with the organization so it is in all cases defining to the individual and so is probably justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmm, we have the article Eagle Scouts. Let me look around.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • so we do not seem to have any category for those who were Eagle Scouts. It is mentioned in some articles, such as the one on Howard W. Hunter. Also Dallin H. Oaks. The later person is in 22 categories, so I really do not think even the Eagle Scout category would be justified. We do have Category:Recipients of the Bronze Wolf Award and we have Category:People associated with Scouting. Hmm, we also have Category:People associated with the Boy Scouts of America. I see Marvin J. Ashton is in the category. I have to say my main take away after reading the biography we have of Ashton is that it has too little information. It does have a section on his connections with scouting. On the other hand I just removed David Archuleta from the category, because the article said nothing about him being a Boy Scout. I am 100% sure he was enrolled as a boy scout, every Latter-day Saint male youth in the US his age was, with rare exceptions like those in my inner city Detroit branch of the church. I would not be surprised if he went on multiple campouts and even made some rank advancesments, but it is not enough to be defining. I am not sure we need the category at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Eagle Scouts category was deleted by consensus in this discussion. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Muslim Students' Association members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING, WP:BLP and WP:FRINGE
Reema Dodin is a high ranking Palestinian American White House official and that's the only article in this category. Her inclusion is based on a citation from the conservative Jewish Press which in turn cites from the conspiracy/fringe WorldNetDaily claiming she is compromised by the Muslim Brotherhood. (Ms. Dodin was indeed in the Muslim Students' Association and, while the early MSA was affiliated with the Brotherhood, the groups were no longer associated when she joined decades later.) The creator of this category has a history of potential WP:BLP violations so the whole point here may be the parent category, which falsely places this person under Category:Muslim Brotherhood members. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_26&oldid=1028827699"