Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 9 January 11 >

January 10[edit]

Category:People from Queens, New York by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:People from Queens, New York, by occupation. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: See WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 November 25#People by city and occupation. --Thedarkknightli (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Catalonia-painter-stub[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and delete. – Fayenatic London 20:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One usage; most other professions are upmerged to Category:Catalan people stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greenland-law-bio-stub[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and delete. – Fayenatic London 20:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One usage; two other professions are already upmerged to Category:Greenlandic people stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC) [reply]
  • Support per nom. An upmerge is fine. --Just N. (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Inspector Gadget films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 02:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Smallcat ★Trekker (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Al-Sadd FC (Saudi Arabia) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Only one entry. Delete per WP:SMALLCAT. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mental health & disorders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 03:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 30#Mental illness in fiction, where "mental illness" categories were renamed to "mental disorders". These two categories do not contain articles or sub-cats about specific disorders, so should be part of Category:Mental health in fiction rather than of Category:Mental disorders in fiction. – Fayenatic London 17:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I do not think that is a good idea. The tree of mental health is largely about "lost mental health" anyway, and I have never seen "lost mental health" as a viable encyclopedic topic. Lost mental health isn't even a redirect. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't say I've ever heard the phrase "lost mental health". --Xurizuri (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch shipbuilders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: For example some yacht builders are listed in the category boat builder and the others are listed in ship builder. It's a vague term and mistakes by other editors will be made. One category should be held for boat builders. Coldbolt (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christian denominations in European navigational boxes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. – Fayenatic London 23:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Wrong spelling. Barumbarumba (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Barumbarumba: it might be helpful if you comment on the alt rename proposal too. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Marcocapelle: Well they are all just denominations that are active in that country and are organized based on their traditions. More like "Types of Christianity in [country name]". When you talk about Christianity as a whole in a country you also must have its history for example or defunct denominations which these templates do not and are not meant to. It's more like "what tradition is present at the moment in that country and what organizations represents them?". I think it might actually be better to rename the templates themselves to "Christian denominations in [country name]" to get rid of the confusion altogether. Barumbarumba (talk) 14:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Virginia state constitutional officer elections[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Virginia is a commonwealth. SecretName101 (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kentucky state constitutional officer elections[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Kentucky is a commonwealth SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This category has been emptied. No need for renaming. Could have been tagged for CSD C1. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, Kentucky is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Massachusetts state constitutional officer elections[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Massachusetts is a commonwealth, not a state SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment First, SecretName101, you created these categories. When you realized your mistake, you could have tagged the pages for speedy deletion as the page creator. Second, these seem like speedy renames, not cases where a week-long discussion is necessary. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, Massachusetts is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pennsylvania state constitutional officer elections[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Pennsylvania is a is a commonwealth, not a state . SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:State constitutional officers of Kentucky[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted WP:G7; but there would be no objection to re-creating a redirect at these names. – Fayenatic London 18:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Redundent. SecretName101 (talk) 03:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mississippi state consititutional officers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted WP:G7; but there would be no objection to re-creating a redirect at these names. – Fayenatic London 18:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Your reason(s) for the proposed merger. SecretName101 (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jaypee University of Information Technology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, this category only contains one member and is unlikely to grow. ✗plicit 01:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support -- without prejudice to recreation if we get more articles that need this category. At present we only have the main article, which is not enough for a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ' Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_10&oldid=1076043986"