Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 15 May 17 >

May 16[edit]

Category:America's Got Talent judges[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT – Muboshgu (talk) 21:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The parent category should probably be nominated for the same reason. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Forza (series)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 24#Category:Forza (series)

WikiProject Animation A-Class categories[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: All these categories are empty as it seems that Template:WikiProject Animation does not support A-class tagging. --Gonnym (talk) 13:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Judge Advocate General's Corps, United States Navy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match article name. See also Category:Administrative corps of the United States Navy for consistency. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Judge Advocate General's Corps, United States Air Force[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match article name. See also Category:United States Air Force specialisms for consistency. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Judge Advocate General's Corps, United States Army[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match article name. See also Category:Branches of the United States Army for consistency. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unexplained archaeological artifacts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is an undefined category with no corresponding main article. A ton of archeological artifacts are not fully explained. Delete and don't upmerge (also, compare to well defined - with main article Category:Out-of-place artifacts). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep. highly stable category, with highly specific and objective criteria for inclusion. serves a valuable purpose here, for encyclopedic coverage. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not see any "highly specific and objective criteria for inclusion". This is a case of creating a category before writing an article about it and it should really be the other way around. Have archaeologists written about "unexplained artefacts" as a topic in its own right? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    we have numerous categories here that do not have an anchor article to accompany it. an anchor article might be one valid basis for creating a category; it has never been asserted as a mandatory criteria or prerequisite for creating a category. --Sm8900 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • We do need one if criteria are as unclear as in this case. And having articles is the primary purpose of Wikipedia anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We have a group of possible geofacts, a submerged megalith of unknown origin and purpose, a stone circle which has not been located, a type of defense wall whose construction technique and function is unknown, and a mound of uncertain origin. How about Category:Archaeological artifacts of unknown purpose? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm totally open to that as an alternate option for this category. thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Unexplained" doesnt seem very defining. Plenty of archaeological artifacts, and other phenomena, were unexplained until somebody explained them. The explanation may or may not stand the test of time. Rathfelder (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mysteries[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I propose upmerging this to parent Category:Unexplained phenomena. Reasons. 1) It's unclear what is the difference between mystery (disambig) and unexplained phenomena (red link). 2) Cat-about states "The main article for this category is Mysteries.", pointing to said disambig, and aside from specific links to movies and such, the only more generic article linked from that is Sacred mysteries. Which is obviously too narrow. Obviously, some sort of category (and main article) are needed, but one should be enough. Splitting mysteries from 'unexplained phenomena' is just pointless creation of poorly defined related entities, category POVFORKs. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Percussion instruments used in worship[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 7#Category:Percussion instruments used in worship

Category:Religious fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. The discussion was leaning keep, though there were concerns about the category's ambiguity. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is no reason to split those concepts, is there? And the 'about Foo' wording is more clear. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the nomination is based on a misunderstanding. Subcategories of Category:Religious fiction contain fiction created by adherents of a particular religion. Religious fiction may be considered to be part of inspirational fiction as a genre. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Marcocapelle Is this differentiation based on sources? (And why isn't it explained in the categories)? In particular, Religious fiction does not explain its scope. How are we to know if the intended or current scope fits your understanding of it? If as you say this category is based on who wrote it, then it should not be under ' Fiction by genre' but under a different tree, 'Fiction by author's background' or such (we do have Category:Fiction by nationality only). Maybe rename to Category:Fiction by author's religious background? We need clear title, the current one is obviously super ambigious. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • For sure Christian novels and Christian drama are a thing, and this category tree of religious fiction apparently expanded from there. It happens more often that higher level categories are not exactly equivalent to a real life concept but still useful to connect lower level categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- There may be a difference between fiction about religious topics and fiction written from a particular religious point of view. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Then at minimum we need a 'category about' description in these categories. Right now they don't address how they differ, which result in entries being added to one or another rather haphazardly. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I can also see a distinction between religious fiction (i.e., from a religious point of view) and fiction about religion, but I'm not convinced we can reliably categorise individual works into one or the other rather than just producing endless arguments over whether a particular work is 'religious enough' to count as the former. FrankSpheres (talk) 10:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. As per Marcocapelle's reasons above. --Sm8900 (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Family saga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (non-admin closure). For what it is worth, I created Category:Family saga television series, as I think that could be done irrespective of the outcome of this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Shouldn't this be plural? If so, the child category should follow suit too. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pranksters[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 8#Category:Pranksters

Category:Foot percussion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 7#Category:Foot percussion

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_16&oldid=1092196500"