Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 26[edit]

Category:Lists of Governors of Turkey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Lists of political office-holders in Turkey. bibliomaniac15 20:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains one list. If renamed to district governors, we can add Kaymakam (main article) and Hasan Hüseyin Can. All the other members of Category:Governors (Turkey) relate to provincial Governor (Turkey). – Fayenatic London 12:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Marcocapelle. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Non-Muslim interactants with Muslims during Muhammad's era[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 4#Category:Non-Muslim interactants with Muslims during Muhammad's era

Category:Literature of official languages of India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Indian literature by language. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small and limited category. We already have categories for Indian literature and Indian literature by language. PepperBeast (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Literature of languages with own distinct writing systems[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 05:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category for the sake of a category, as far as I can tell. PepperBeast (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, this is weird. I don't think there's anything about languages that have a distinct writing system that imbues those languages' literatures with any unifying characteristic. Just a kind of non-sensical category as far as I can tell, although I'd be glad to be proven wrong. Delete unless someone can explain this. VanIsaac, GHTV contWpWS 17:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Literature by language, this does not concern a defining characteristic of literature. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I do not see any clear characteristic worth of a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Literature of Sahitya Akademi recognised languages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Indian literature by language. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Trivial category PepperBeast (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Aghlabid governors of Sicily[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 4#Category:Aghlabid governors of Sicily

Sweden city templates categories[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 4#Sweden city templates categories

Category:Military history of the Almoravid dynasty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: manually merge (move the battles subcategory directly under Almoravid dynasty, but not the generals because they are already in a people subcat). Redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support There is not enough content to require multiple categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Diplomats who were scholars where they worked[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "Diplomats who were scholars where they worked" is legitimate information for a description, yet insufficiently defining for a category. gidonb (talk) 05:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TRIVIALCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral I created the category. I fail to see the usefulness of the objection, but I will not fight this. I will let others decide, though I expect very few votes. Pete unseth (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Capital Comets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The sports teams at Capital University were renamed from Crusaders to Comers in 2021; see https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/education/2021/09/30/capital-university-retires-old-mascot-become-comets/5935690001/. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nehwon locations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Nehwon. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT with only one article. I would also support an upmerge to Category:Nehwon which isn't very large either. Jontesta (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buffy the Vampire Slayer locations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT with a single article. It is unlikely that many articles can be created that would meet the Wikipedia policy, and Category:Buffy the Vampire Slayer is sufficient. Jontesta (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There is no need to merge, the article is already in the parent category too. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with nominator. Pete unseth (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- The one article is adequately categorised. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.